Loser Q denier losers didn't trust that I knew what a losing team was constituted despite me being a statistician and scientist. They were saying something like,"You need a hard and fast set of rules to know if your allies are bad." And that ain't true for you can eyeball matches pretty easy and see the kill differentials or a guy losing on purpose. It is hard to eyeball test. It is actual science to poll many people and ask them their mood or if they like the taste of something, and this involves numbers. Anyway that's the boring preface:
So we show a visual representation of the stat taking here:
#1 I do not count a game a win or lose unless I consciously keep track of stats prior to the match. There is a faulty way of taking statistics that you start on the first result you're biased towards, we don't do that.
#2 I do not count any games I play bad and let my enemy snowball from my own personal play.
#3 I do count the games where my KDA is atrocious, but only because of a fed mid or jungle coming down where the difference was easier to see earlier, but I waited til later to screen shot.
#4 Generally I'm looking for a difference of 5+ kills with dragons counting as roughly 2, or an afker.
Results:
LOSING TEAM
Game 1 L 0-1 :
LOSING TEAM
Game 2 L 0-2:
LOSING TEAM
Game 3 L 0-3 :
LOSING TEAM
Game 4 L 0-4:
WINNING TEAM!
Game 5 W 1-4:
LOSING TEAM
Game 6 L 1-5:
LOSING TEAM
Game 7 L 1-6:
LOSING TEAM
Game 8 L 1-7:
WINNING TEAM!
Game 9 W 2-7:
WINNING TEAM!
Game 10 W 3-7:
LOSING TEAM
Game 11 L 3-8:
LOSING TEAM
Game 12 L 3-9:
LOSING TEAM
Game 13 L 3-10[Explaination of bad kda. We had a crushing and won lane. Then our jungle pantheon comes and derp dives over and over feeding the lane and getting us commited when we didn't want him anywhere near it. I think he saw low health champs and couldn't resist level 3 tower diving, as many noobs do.]:
WINNING TEAM!
Game 14 W 3-11:
WINNING TEAM!
Game 15 W 4-11:
LOSING TEAM
Game 16 L 4-12 [Explaination of bad kda, they fed other lanes significantly triggering the loser q rating already then the fed champs just ganked our lane some]:
LOSING TEAM
Game 17 L 4-13:
LOSING TEAM
Game 18 L 4-14:
LOSING TEAM
Game 19 L 4-15:
LOSING TEAM
Game 20 L 4-16:
LOSING TEAM
Game 21 L 4-17:
LOSING TEAM
Game 22 L 4-18:
LOSING TEAM
Game 23 L 4-19:
LOSING TEAM
Game 24 L 4-20:
LOSING TEAM
Game 25 L 4-21:[Explainating of bad kda, they triggered loser team before I started dying much. 7-0 mid pants by 10 min...
LOSING TEAM
Game 26 L 4-22: [Bad KDA is after the fact of snowball, we started 4/0 in bot lane and other lanes fed super fast triggering loser q status, this screen shot was just taken way later]
WINNING TEAM!
Game 27 W 5-22:
WINNING TEAM!
Game 28 W 6-22:
LOSING TEAM
Game 29 L 6-23:
WINNING TEAM!
Game 30 W 7-23:
Game 31: L 7-24:
[Comprable Support KDA, but Jax just decided to start inting to lose on purpose]
LOSING TEAM
Game 32 L 7-25:
LOSING TEAM
Game 33 L 7-26:
LOSING TEAM
Game 34 L 7-27: [Jinx AFKed after arguing that I should not take CS that she wasn't able to. She inted some too, yet we won 6v4, still racked up as loser q because my adc literally afked over half the game because she was upset. More Trivia: I got a chat ban on this one! Its funny too because I was trying to act like Mr. Rogers or a Guidence Councellor and be really nice despite Jinx's toxcity. I defended her from verbal assault by saying,"Yeah, it is okay if you afk by tower. Maybe Jinx will come to her senses and help win latyer" When Jinx unafked for a minute to take a tower, I said,"Nice tower Jinx!" When we were doing ocean soul point, I told Jinx,"Hey I won't even report you if you come help. I offer forgiveness often." So I was trying to be incredibly nice. Even the chat in the window where I said he was probably a kid, I wasn't getting down. I was trying to explain how lots of kids have broken homes and stuff today so don't get down on him... Yet... 35 day chat ban for being nice. LOL! ]
LOSING TEAM
Game 35 L 7-28:
LOSING TEAM
Game 36 L 7-29:
WINNING TEAM!
Game 37 W 8-29:
LOSING TEAM
Game 38 L 8-30:
LOSING TEAM
Game 39 L 8-31:
LOSING TEAM
Game 40 L 8-32"
LOSING TEAM
Game 41:
L 8-33 
WINNING TEAM!
Game 42 W 9-33:
WINNING TEAM!
Game 43 W 10-33:
LOSING TEAM
Game 44 L 10-34:
LOSING TEAM
Game 45 L 10-35:
LOSING TEAM
Game 46 L 10-36:
LOSING TEAM
Game 47 L 10-37:
LOSING TEAM
Game 48 L 10-38:
LOSING TEAM
Game 49 L 10-39:
LOSING TEAM
Game 50 L 10-40:
LOSING TEAM
Game 51 L 10-41:
Final 51 game sample: 10 winning teams - 41 losing teams, a bunch of even matches thrown out and where I feed thrown out.
Percentage of losing games is 41 losing teams / 50 total games = 82% losing teams.
This is a very interesting number because my last exact stat tracking of 50 had exactly 40 losing teams for 80%.
And I did 1500 games last season before where I paid attention in my mind very carefully, and it was 80%.
And I did 1500 games before that last season where I couldn't help but notice,"It's like 80% of my games have feeder teams." so I started taking statistics.
The odds of 80% of 3100 coin flips is beyond astronomical literally. For there are only 1x10^80 atoms in the universe. However the odds of getting 80% of 3100 coin flips or 2480 tails out of 3100 flips = 1.744 x 10 ^ 261, far more than atoms in the universe 1x10^80... To put this in perpective, if there is not a loser q, then I was able to do the statistical equivalent of picking a random atom in the universe and it be the exact same one if one other was picked at random too... Then do it again. Then do it again! Three in a row! But wait, that only accounts for 1x10^240. We still have 1.744x10&21 left! Well after picking that one right atom in the universe three times in a row, just hit the powerball lottery twice in a row. Then pick one number in 17,000 and there you have it!
Either loser q exists or you think picking one atom in the universe correctly three times in a row, hitting the powerball twice in a row, then picking one number in 17,000 is a common occurance. In which case you should buy my book "No One Wins the Lottery" because you probably play it.